lauantai 13. huhtikuuta 2019

PHEV vs EV

 
As previously mentioned, I got PHEV Mitsubishi Outlander last year. It has 12kWh battery and best I've gotten out of it is around 40 km, 35 being more typical, even in optimal weather. So let's say 40km to be optimistic, which puts its consumption to around 0.3 kWh/km range. And this is in summer - in winter the figure is much worse, down to 20km (0.6 kWh/km!) with heating on, or even full zero km when it's cold enough (around -25 degrees C, if I remember correctly - at that point it just doesn't use the battery any more.)  Effectively, to get anywhere with electric power, it has to be charged every night.

Not great figures, those. Not at all. So I was somewhat doubtful with full EVs. As it turns out, if you do things right, the figures are completely different.

I got Hyundai Kona Electric just few weeks ago now, and so far I've put around 800km to it (including one 300km one-day business trip, with no charging on the way). At the moment it's still early spring, so temperature hovers around 0 degrees C now, so best figure I've gotten out of this car is about 380km. The car has 64kWh battery, so this works out to about 0.16 kWh/km figure. Almost half of the Outlander's figure! And this is with heating and everything running.

And just to clarify this, right now (temperature being around 0 C) the reported range of each car, with full battery, is as follows:
RangeConsumption
Outlander, heating on25 km0.480 kWh/km
Outlander, heating off38 km0.315 kWh/km
Kona, heating on380 km0.168 kWh/km
Kona, heating off400 km0.160 kWh/km

Aerodynamics certainly has some effect on these figures, although I can't say how big the effect is. Weigh shouldn't make that much difference, as they're near enough (around 1700kg for Kona vs 1800kg, if I remember right - battery in Kona is heavy.)  4-wheel drive of Outlander might have some effect too.

I guess the most surprising part with Kona is that the heating has so little effect to range. It apparently has system (heat pump?) that can use the waste heat from power electronics to heat the cabin, which is pretty nice in cold climates. How well it works when it's really cold is a question that has to wait until next winter though.

The primary difference, as far as I can see, is that Outlander is designed as gasoline-powered car first, and PHEV part is almost an afterthought, and thus there are too many compromises in design, each nibbling a bit away from the efficiency of the whole system, and end result is disappointingly mediocre. It's not horribly bad, but when comparing these two, the inefficiency is obvious. I can't help but wonder how the system would work if it were designed as electric first, but just with small battery and small gasoline engine put in some corner to function purely as a generator when needed.
Not to say that Kona is designed as electric first (as there are gasoline powered Konas available), but I am certain that requirements of EV have played significant role in design.

There's also battery life I'm kinda concerned about. With my current driving, I charge Kona once a week, or once in two weeks. Hyundai gives pretty amazing battery warranty of 8 years (or 200 000 km), and unless something goes horribly wrong, so I don't see issues there. Except possibly long wait for battery replacement, if things are as I fear they are.
Outlander, however, needs to be charged daily. As battery life typically is primarily set by charge cycles, this daily charging requirements is kinda bothering me. And of course Mitsubishi doesn't have as generous warranty as Hyundai either.

Now, a question many might ask: How does the Kona EV work as a car?

In short, I like it. Long range makes it perfectly fine for normal weekday driving, and since I find that I only need to charge it on weekends, longer charging period isn't really an issue either. My main gripe is that it's small. There's no way we could go for a weekend trip as whole family, dogs and all, without having some serious space issues (roof rack excluded; I don't like them, but I might have to reconsider). But if I go to business trip alone, or with just one or two persons with me, it would easily carry me, although longer recharge times between 300-400km of driving will change pacing of such trips in future.

So for now, when packing heavy, Outlander is the car of choice, simply due to its size. But I will be seriously considering switching immediately when similarly-sized all-electric vehicles become available - at reasonable price, of course.



Ei kommentteja:

Lähetä kommentti